105 Organizations Call on Senate to Strengthen Protections for Immigrant Survivors in VAWA 2021

By Admin

|

June 4, 2021

Last month, the Alliance for Immigrant Survivors (AIS) sent a letter signed by 105 organizations to Senate leadership to strengthen protections for immigrant survivors in the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) 2021. For over 25 years, VAWA has served as a rare example of how a bipartisan Congress can protect survivors and strengthen their ability to overcome abuse. Now, as the Senate considers its next actions on VAWA, we urge them to continue the tradition of safeguarding protections for all survivors, including immigrant survivors who are experiencing domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, and other crimes. 

AIS supports the latest bipartisan VAWA reauthorization, H.R. 1620, which takes a holistic approach, addressing the complexities of survivors’ lives, and maintains established protections, while also addressing persistent gaps. Yet, VAWA 2021 doesn’t solve the problems facing tens of thousands of immigrant survivors who have faced additional threats and barriers over the last several years.

In our letter, we called on the Senate to include these critical protections for immigrant survivors:

  • Ensure that survivors are not deported before their applications are adjudicated as this clearly undermines the bipartisan purpose that survivors have the ability to seek protection against deportation;
  • Raise the U Visa cap so that more survivors have access to these critical protections, an effort that was supported by President Biden given its inclusion in the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021;
  • Add hate crimes and other qualifying crimes to the U visa statute to ensure that those who are victims of racist violence may seek paths to safety and justice;
  • Strengthen confidentiality in protections for survivors who apply for VAWA self petitions, U visa and T visa applications by limiting information sharing about their applications;
  • Ensure access to work authorization for survivors given the egregious delays in the processing of VAWA self-petitions, U visa and T visa applications. These significant delays, coupled with other barriers, such as a lack of access to financial supports, can subject survivors to additional risks and barriers;
  • Provide access to basic economic and housing supports for immigrant survivors in order to escape and overcome abuse and exploitation.

This latest reauthorization of VAWA is already three years behind schedule, as the last reauthorization was in 2013. Failure to strengthen immigration protections created in VAWA and subsequent reauthorizations has resulted in substantial barriers for immigrant survivors and their children. The time to strengthen these immigration protections is now, and VAWA is the right vehicle to do it.

Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

By Maria Lazzarino April 28, 2026
This Practice Pointer synthesizes current recommendations for using USCIS customer service options for survivor-based relief applications. It also discusses how to supplement pending survivor-based petitions via mail, with the hotlines as a backup paper trail. As noted throughout, the information is accurate up to the publication date, but should always be cross-checked with information on USCIS’s website and Policy Manual for the most up-to-date government provisos. This project was supported by Grant No. 15JOVW-23-GK-05161-MUMU awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication/program/exhibition are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women.
By Maria Lazzarino April 28, 2026
On December 22, 2025, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) released an update to its Policy Manual relating to confidentiality protections located at 8 USC § 1367 (“1367 protections”). This Policy Alert will review the changes introduced by the policy update and provide initial guidance to practitioners filing cases affected by them. ASISTA will provide further guidance through training and written resources as warranted, and members are encouraged to request technical assistance for any individual case questions.
By Maria Lazzarino April 24, 2026
ASISTA is aware that the USCIS “Contact Us” page does not include information about which hotline address should be contacted for U cases with receipt numbers that start with IOE. After reaching out to USCIS, until the Contact Us page is updated to reflect their “final determination,” practitioners inquiring about U cases with receipt numbers starting with IOE should reach out to the VSC 918/914 hotline. See this Practice Alert for more information.
By Maria Lazzarino December 12, 2025
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.
By Maria Lazzarino December 12, 2025
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed HR-1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which significantly impacts immigrant survivors of human trafficking. The law imposes new filing fees for immigration benefits, motions, and appeals before USCIS and EOIR, establishes additional financial penalties for certain immigration violations, and eliminates eligibility for a range of federal public benefits for many immigrants who were previously considered “qualified,” including trafficking survivors. This Practice Alert reviews these fee and penalty changes, explains the new restrictions on public benefits, and outlines the impact on trafficking survivors seeking T visas and other forms of humanitarian relief, offering guidance for practitioners on how to mitigate the law’s potential harms.