U visas cases in Proceedings
By Maria Lazzarino
•
July 19, 2024
In July 2024, ASISTA and partners joined an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in the case of Bouarfa v. Mayorkas. The case centers on the judicial reviewability of DHS’s revocation authority in the family-based immigration context, and the brief aims to highlight how any decision on such reviewability could also impact justice for survivors who are seeking or were granted U, T, or VAWA-based relief. Click here access the amicus brief. Bouarfa v. Mayorkas
By Maria Lazzarino
•
February 12, 2020
Yesterday, ASISTA, along with our partners, submitted an amicus brief challenging EOIR’s erosion of docketing tools like continuances and administrative closures. This errosion results in limiting access to critical immigration relief for survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking and other serious crimes.
By Maria Lazzarino
•
February 4, 2020
ASISTA has developed this Practice Advisory: The Impact of Matter of L-N-Y- , 27 I&N 755 (BIA 2020) , which provides a detailed overview of provisions in this precedential decision, discusses its intersection with other BIA decisions on continuances, and provides best practices for requesting continuances for U visa applicants in removal proceedings. We’ve also summarized our key practice pointers in this Practice FAQ . Click here to download the practice advisory in Word version and here for the FAQ in Word version.
By Maria Lazzarino
•
November 12, 2019
Many thanks to fellow authors: Nareeneh Sohbatian from Winston & Strawn LA, and Brigit Greeson Alvarez and Victoria Bonds (intern extraordinaire) from LAFLA. Click here for amicus filed at the 9th Circuit , and click here for amicus filed at the BIA . To download the briefs in Word version, click here for 9th circuit brief , and here for the BIA brief .
By Admin
•
December 28, 2017
Many thanks, again, to Chuck Roth for NIJC for leading this effort.
Recent Posts
By N/A N/A
•
May 6, 2026
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.

By Maria Lazzarino
•
May 6, 2026
On January 23, 2026, the federal Trafficking Survivors’ Relief Act of 2026 (TSRA) became law. The TSRA provides a remedy for trafficking survivors to obtain relief from federal criminal records stemming directly from their exploitation. In enacting the TSRA, Congress acknowledged that trafficking survivors frequently acquire a criminal history as a result of their exploitation, which can be a barrier to employment, housing, education, and essential support services and make them more vulnerable to re-exploitation. This 2-pager describes the TSRA and its potential use by immigrant survivors of trafficking charged with or convicted of federal crimes.
By Maria Lazzarino
•
May 6, 2026
Trying to help a trafficking survivor decide whether to file a T visa application? This practice advisory includes factors to consider and discuss with the client.
By Maria Lazzarino
•
May 6, 2026
The age-in rule is a statutory provision designed to protect VAWA derivatives from losing eligibility when they turn 21. This written resource describes the age-in rule and provides practical tips for practitioners to harness its potential.
