ASISTA Celebrates USCIS Fee Schedule Rule as Victory for Immigrant Survivors of Violence

By Ahlam Moussa

|

February 9, 2024

30%20years%20bright%20horizons.png

Dear Members,

       On January 31, 2024, USCIS published its Final Rule Adjusting the USCIS Fee Schedule. The new regulation, which goes into effect on April 1, 2024, is a significant victory for immigrants applying for survivor-based benefits. ASISTA and our partners pushed for the rule to be as expansive as possible in its humanitarian fee exemptions, as part of our ongoing advocacy for improved safety, stability, and legal access for immigrant survivors. We applaud USCIS and DHS for hearing us and recognizing that survivors often experience extreme economic difficulties that should not prevent their access to justice. This final rule takes an important step by codifying and expanding fee exemptions for survivors and other vulnerable groups, ensuring that cost is not a barrier in the pursuit of lawful status.

       We encourage attorneys to take the time to review the final rule to understand how it will benefit their clients, and consider participating in the USCIS National Engagement on the rule, happening Feb. 22, 2024. Here are some of the important changes that will impact immigrant survivors applying for benefits:

Immigrant survivors of violence will benefit enormously

from ample exemptions to USCIS filing fees.

       The final rule codifies fee exemptions for most humanitarian-related forms of relief and  provides additional fee exemptions for certain immigration benefit requests beyond the initial humanitarian related filing. These exemptions are true exemptions and do not require submission of a fee waiver request. For example, under the new rule, all forms associated with an application for T nonimmigrant status, including Form I-192 waiver applications and Form I-765 work permit applications, are fee-exempt through final adjudication of the Form I-485. Other applicants who will benefit similarly include VAWA self-petitioners and their derivatives, U-visa applicants, Special Immigrant Juveniles, conditional residents applying for a waiver of Form I-751 based on battery or extreme cruelty, Special Immigrant Afghan or Iraqi Interpreters or Translators and other vulnerable applicants. Practitioners can find the complete list of the recently codified additional fee exemptions in the final rule in Table 5C here.

New, higher fees may still impact survivors

who apply for non-survivor-based immigration benefits.

       Survivors pursuing a non-survivor-based immigration option that will not be fee-exempt should be advised that the new rule may increase the cost of that application. Such applicants may choose to file before the rule takes effect or prepare for the additional expense if they must file after April 1, 2024. Practitioners should be aware of the following notable changes in the final rule:

  • Applications for naturalization, even if filed by survivors, are not fee-exempt, but will have expanded fee reduction options.
  • Benefit requests submitted electronically will save $50.
  • Fee waivers will continue to be available for many applicants who do not qualify for an exemption, but receive mean-tested public benefits, have income at or below 150% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines or who demonstrate financial hardship.

Many forms will be revised and prior editions

should not be used after April 1, 2024.

       The FAQ featured on the USCIS website lists the revised forms that will go into effect on April 1, 2024, along with the new fees. USCIS will accept prior editions of most forms during a grace period from April 1, 2024 to June 3, 2024, as long as they were filed with the correct updated fee. Please note that certain forms related to non-immigrant and immigrant workers as well as orphan petitions will not be granted a grace period.

Celebrate but stay informed!

       ASISTA and our partners fought hard for the new rule to acknowledge and alleviate the special financial stressors that exist for survivors. We are extremely pleased with the decision to have the final rule exempt the full suite of U, T, and VAWA-related applications in particular. We will continue to monitor USCIS as it transitions to the final rule in the coming weeks and months. We hope you will help by drawing our attention to any areas of concern in implementation. As with any advocacy efforts, it is critical to stay informed and proactive about adapting to changes. We appreciate your continued commitment to advocating for immigrant survivors and we at ASISTA remain steadfast in our support of your valuable work.

Warm regards,

Kirsten Rambo, Cristina Velez & the ASISTA Team

Recent Posts

By Maria Lazzarino December 12, 2025
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.
By Maria Lazzarino December 12, 2025
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed HR-1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which significantly impacts immigrant survivors of human trafficking. The law imposes new filing fees for immigration benefits, motions, and appeals before USCIS and EOIR, establishes additional financial penalties for certain immigration violations, and eliminates eligibility for a range of federal public benefits for many immigrants who were previously considered “qualified,” including trafficking survivors. This Practice Alert reviews these fee and penalty changes, explains the new restrictions on public benefits, and outlines the impact on trafficking survivors seeking T visas and other forms of humanitarian relief, offering guidance for practitioners on how to mitigate the law’s potential harms.
By Maria Lazzarino June 11, 2025
In May and June 2025, ASISTA joined partners at Boston College School of Law, Harbor COV, and Tahirih to submit an amicus briefs to the First and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals in cases challenging the executive order on birthright citizenship. ASISTA and partners highlighted the importance of maintaining a preliminary injunction against implementing the order. If the order were implemented, many immigrant mothers of U.S.-born children would only be able to prove their child’s citizenship by submitting documentation about the child’s father’s immigration status. For survivors of intimate partner violence, just knowing the need for this documentation could make it difficult or impossible to leave the abusive relationship. For survivors of sexual assault or trafficking, contacting the perpetrator for the paperwork could put them and their families in immediate physical danger. Using real-life examples, the brief illustrates the stakes if immigrant parents were forced to choose between maintaining their safety and establishing their children’s rights. It urges the court not let this become reality. Read the First Circuit Brief, Doe v. Trump , here ; read the Fourth Circuit Brief, Casa, Inc., et al. v. Trump , here .
By Maria Lazzarino May 30, 2025
On March 14, 2025, President Trump attempted to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify carrying out deportations without the due process of immigration proceedings. Since then, multiple federal courts have ruled the invocation was unlawful, but the government continues to fight for its usage, including before the U.S. Supreme Court. On May 16, 2025, the Supreme Court maintained a temporary prohibition on the deportations planned in Texas and sent the issue back to the lower courts. ASISTA celebrates the positive rulings but notes with condemnation that the push against them is ongoing. Check ASISTA’s alert: The Fight to Protect Survivors from the Alien Enemies Act Continue.
By Maria Lazzarino April 28, 2025
Practitioners have reported receiving RFEs and NOIDs in cases submitted with electronically reproduced signatures for original, wet ink signatures where USCIS has requested the original, wet ink signatures. This Practice Alert describes what USCIS’ current signature policy is and what options practitioners have in these cases.