ASISTA Denounces President Biden’s Dangerous Border Proclamation

By Ahlam Moussa

|

June 5, 2024

ASISTA Denounces President Biden’s Dangerous Border Proclamation

Today, President Biden issued a proclamation to “secure the border” between the US and Mexico, to take effect at midnight tonight. This action, unfortunately, will accomplish just the opposite, sowing chaos and further compounding the trauma of those who arrive here urgently seeking safety. Deterrence policies like these have resoundingly failed at their stated aims, and this proclamation will have devastating effects.

Survivors of violence and their children—who have been traumatized in their home country and, often, on the perilous journey to the US as well—will suffer particular harm as a result of this policy, in direct contradiction to President Biden’s frequently stated concern for victims of violence. A notably cruel feature of this new policy provides that only those who affirmatively express their fear of torture or persecution or desire to apply for asylum will be provided the opportunity to apply. The countless traumatized individuals who do not know to announce their fear immediately, without ever being asked, will be turned away to face additional danger. Historically marginalized and under-resourced communities and people, including survivors of color and LGBTQI+ survivors, always bear these life-threatening burdens disproportionately, and this time will be no different.

The proclamation outlines a set of draconian measures that are triggered by a numerical cap of individuals seeking to enter the US. Intentionally choosing a cap that is well below current numbers of arriving migrants—and an even lower numerical threshold to pause the order—ensures that thousands of arriving migrants will be turned away. In the meantime, numbers of those awaiting entry will rise, while access to safety and basic services for those waiting become increasingly, and dangerously, out of reach.

There are orderly ways to welcome new arrivals and assess their needs. By choosing instead to turn traumatized people away, denying them their human right to seek safety here, this administration chooses further harm to those most in need of critical protection. We urge the administration to reverse course immediately and instead invest in more effectively receiving and processing the cases of people seeking asylum.

Kirsten Rambo, Executive Director of ASISTA, notes, “Every person deserves safety and dignity, no matter where we are born. While this administration tragically mimics the cruel and ineffective policies of the prior one, we at ASISTA will continue pushing relentlessly for policies that advance the dignity, safety, and justice that survivors of gender-based violence and their children deserve.”

Established in 2008, ASISTA is a national leader in the movement for safety and justice for immigrant survivors of gender-based violence. ASISTA’s founders helped write the immigration provisions of the federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act (TVPA), affording legal status to hundreds of thousands of survivors and their children since 1994. With over 2,500 members nationwide, ASISTA’s work is focused on 1) providing expert case consultation, training, and resources to attorneys and advocates navigating the complex immigration system on behalf of survivors of gender-based violence, including intervening in specific cases as needed; 2) pushing for federal, state and local policies that ensure safety and justice for immigrant survivors; and 3) coordinating lawsuits to prevent the government from unfairly deporting survivors of violence. To learn more about ASISTA’s work, click here. Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, X, & Instagram.

###

Recent Posts

By Maria Lazzarino December 12, 2025
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.
By Maria Lazzarino December 12, 2025
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed HR-1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which significantly impacts immigrant survivors of human trafficking. The law imposes new filing fees for immigration benefits, motions, and appeals before USCIS and EOIR, establishes additional financial penalties for certain immigration violations, and eliminates eligibility for a range of federal public benefits for many immigrants who were previously considered “qualified,” including trafficking survivors. This Practice Alert reviews these fee and penalty changes, explains the new restrictions on public benefits, and outlines the impact on trafficking survivors seeking T visas and other forms of humanitarian relief, offering guidance for practitioners on how to mitigate the law’s potential harms.
By Maria Lazzarino June 11, 2025
In May and June 2025, ASISTA joined partners at Boston College School of Law, Harbor COV, and Tahirih to submit an amicus briefs to the First and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals in cases challenging the executive order on birthright citizenship. ASISTA and partners highlighted the importance of maintaining a preliminary injunction against implementing the order. If the order were implemented, many immigrant mothers of U.S.-born children would only be able to prove their child’s citizenship by submitting documentation about the child’s father’s immigration status. For survivors of intimate partner violence, just knowing the need for this documentation could make it difficult or impossible to leave the abusive relationship. For survivors of sexual assault or trafficking, contacting the perpetrator for the paperwork could put them and their families in immediate physical danger. Using real-life examples, the brief illustrates the stakes if immigrant parents were forced to choose between maintaining their safety and establishing their children’s rights. It urges the court not let this become reality. Read the First Circuit Brief, Doe v. Trump , here ; read the Fourth Circuit Brief, Casa, Inc., et al. v. Trump , here .
By Maria Lazzarino May 30, 2025
On March 14, 2025, President Trump attempted to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify carrying out deportations without the due process of immigration proceedings. Since then, multiple federal courts have ruled the invocation was unlawful, but the government continues to fight for its usage, including before the U.S. Supreme Court. On May 16, 2025, the Supreme Court maintained a temporary prohibition on the deportations planned in Texas and sent the issue back to the lower courts. ASISTA celebrates the positive rulings but notes with condemnation that the push against them is ongoing. Check ASISTA’s alert: The Fight to Protect Survivors from the Alien Enemies Act Continue.
By Maria Lazzarino April 28, 2025
Practitioners have reported receiving RFEs and NOIDs in cases submitted with electronically reproduced signatures for original, wet ink signatures where USCIS has requested the original, wet ink signatures. This Practice Alert describes what USCIS’ current signature policy is and what options practitioners have in these cases.