ASISTA Opposes Harmful Proposed Rule Expanding Biometric Collection & Surveillance
By Admin
|
October 14, 2020
On October 13, 2020, ASISTA submitted a comment in response to USCIS harmful new proposed rule that would pose significant privacy, confidentiality and safety implications for immigrant survivors of domestic and sexual violence, human trafficking, and other gender-based abuses.
The proposed rule would change, among other things:
- Drastically increase the types of biometric information collected from those who interact with DHS, even U.S. citizens, who are filing or associated with an immigration benefit, request, or enforcement, to include iris images, palm and voice prints, and DNA
- Change evidentiary requirements for VAWA Self-Petitioners and T visa holders applying for their green card as evidence of good moral character.
- Unlawfully expand the “lookback” period of good moral character determinations for VAWA self-petitions and T adjustment applications
- Eliminate the presumption of good moral character for those under 14 years old who are seeking status as VAWA Self-Petitioners and T visa adjustment.
- Creates harmful “continuous vetting” procedures in which individuals may “be subjected to continued and subsequent evaluation of eligibility for their immigration benefits to ensure they continue to present no risk of causing harm subsequent to their entry.”
Read ASISTA’s comment in opposition to this harmful rule below.
Leave a Comment
Recent Posts
By Maria Lazzarino
•
May 29, 2026
This Quick Reference Guide and Risk Assessment Worksheet is designed to accompany the longer Practice Advisory on Factors to Weigh When Considering a T visa. It provides a streamlined overview of key considerations and a practical tool for identifying potential risks, benefits, and client-specific concerns during case consultations.
By Maria Lazzarino
•
May 28, 2026
Survivors hoping to earn U- or T-based adjustment of status must generally spend 3 years in U or T status and must be in valid U or T status when they apply to adjust. If a survivor falls out of status, they may be able to regain status by means of a nunc pro tunc extension of status application. This Practice Advisory describes how to submit a nunc pro tunc I-539 extension of status application and contains an annotated sample filing from a successful case. It warns that nunc pro tunc I-539s may not be filed if removal proceedings have commenced against the survivor.
By N/A N/A
•
May 6, 2026
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.

By Maria Lazzarino
•
May 6, 2026
On January 23, 2026, the federal Trafficking Survivors’ Relief Act of 2026 (TSRA) became law. The TSRA provides a remedy for trafficking survivors to obtain relief from federal criminal records stemming directly from their exploitation. In enacting the TSRA, Congress acknowledged that trafficking survivors frequently acquire a criminal history as a result of their exploitation, which can be a barrier to employment, housing, education, and essential support services and make them more vulnerable to re-exploitation. This 2-pager describes the TSRA and its potential use by immigrant survivors of trafficking charged with or convicted of federal crimes.
