ASISTA Statement on Updated USCIS Guidance

By neonadmin

|

July 6, 2018

New USCIS Guidance will create a chilling effect on survivors coming forward to access protection. 

Yesterday, USCIS released Updated Guidance for the Referral of Cases and Issuance of Notices to Appear (NTAs) in Cases Involving Inadmissible and Deportable Aliens (Updated NTA memo) which vastly expands the circumstances in which USCIS will issue NTAs or refer cases to ICE. This guidance implements the directive from the January 2017 Executive Order that individuals whose legal claims to remain in the United States have been lawfully rejected should be removed.

The updated NTA memo echoes the expanded enforcement priorities found in the executive orders; most notably, cases presenting a criminal history, fraud or misrepresentation or abuse of public benefits are high among the enforcement priorities. The updated NTA memo also states that USCIS will issue an NTA if a case has been denied and the individual is not legally present in the United States.

In cases involving VAWA, U and T visa applications, the Updated NTA memo states USCIS must follow the guidelines established in the memo once the case has been denied. It had been a long standing practice that USCIS did not typically issue NTAs in connection with survivor-based filings like VAWA self-petitions, U and T visa applications. This was done in part due to the recognition of the chilling effect that this would have on victims coming forward to access these protections.

Immigrant survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault often face barriers when seeking safety and protection, including threats from abusers and perpetrators that reaching out for help will result in their deportation. To address these barriers, Congress created essential protections in the Violence Against Women Act to provide survivors with protections against deportation to allow the to seek help without fear of abuser retaliation. The Updated NTA Memo flagrantly disregards and undermines the bi-partisan Congressional intent of establishing these critical safeguards for immigrant victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, and other crimes.

In the upcoming days, ASISTA will be working on a practice advisory for those who serve VAWA, U and T visa applicants as well as co-hosting a call with our allies to discuss the implications of this memo. We are deeply disappointed by and concerned about this guidance. It will harm victims of crime, as the fear of the consequences of denial may prevent them from coming forward.


Sincerely,

Cecelia Friedman Levin
Senior Policy Counsel
ASISTA

Recent Posts

By N/A N/A May 6, 2026
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges. 
By Maria Lazzarino May 6, 2026
On January 23, 2026, the federal Trafficking Survivors’ Relief Act of 2026 (TSRA) became law. The TSRA provides a remedy for trafficking survivors to obtain relief from federal criminal records stemming directly from their exploitation. In enacting the TSRA, Congress acknowledged that trafficking survivors frequently acquire a criminal history as a result of their exploitation, which can be a barrier to employment, housing, education, and essential support services and make them more vulnerable to re-exploitation. This 2-pager describes the TSRA and its potential use by immigrant survivors of trafficking charged with or convicted of federal crimes.
By Maria Lazzarino May 6, 2026
Trying to help a trafficking survivor decide whether to file a T visa application? This practice advisory includes factors to consider and discuss with the client.
By Maria Lazzarino May 6, 2026
The age-in rule is a statutory provision designed to protect VAWA derivatives from losing eligibility when they turn 21. This written resource describes the age-in rule and provides practical tips for practitioners to harness its potential.