ICYMI (In Case You Missed It): Sharing Important Policy Updates

By Ahlam Moussa

|

December 24, 2020

A lot has happened in the past week! We’ve compiled a short list of important updates to help you keep track. 

1. Expansion of Filing Flexibility: On December 18, USCIS announced that it would continue its policy of flexible deadlines for requests, notices or decisions issued between March 1, 2020, and Jan. 31, 2021, inclusive. For more information, visit https://www.uscis.gov/about-us/uscis-response-to-covid-19

2. Important Update on Blank Space Policy Litigation: Good news in Vangala v. USCIS, the lawsuit that the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, and Van Der Hout LLP filed last month, challenging USCIS’ blank space/rejection policy. USCIS has agreed to pause implementation of the rejection policy starting December 24, 2020; the parties will enter into negotiations to resolve the claims. NILA, NWIRP, and VDH will be reaching out as they begin discussing proposals as to how to identify applications that were previously returned under the rejection policies, as we seek to ensure that those affected have a mechanism to restore the original filing dates. If you received a rejection notice dated after December 24, 2020, you can contact counsel for plaintiffs at bspolicy@nwirp.org ASISTA is proud to support our partners in this important litigation.

3. Policy Manual Changes: Last month, USCIS announced several changes to the Policy Manual, including changes to assessments of discretion in adjustment of status cases, and determinations of lawful admission for naturalization. Along with partner organizations, ASISTA submitted comments in opposition to these policy changes which you can review here:

4. EOIR Comment Opportunities-deadlines December 28th: EOIR announced two proposed rules that would threaten the safety of survivors – including immigrant survivors – of domestic and sexual violence, human trafficking, and other gender-based abuses by drastically limiting their ability to seek continuances in Immigration Court, and to reopen prior removal orders. The Alliance for Immigrant Survivors (AIS) developed a template on these proposed rules and compiled additional resources, available here. Please voice your opposition to these harmful rules today! 

5. Issuance of Final Regulations on Asylum, Admin Closure and more: DHS and DOJ announced they have finalized the exceedingly harmful asylum rule which will be effective next month. This new rule decimates asylum options for survivors of gender based violence.  Read AIS alert here.  Several lawsuits have recently been brought in response to this harmful rule, including those brought by Lamda Legal, Immigration Equality and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP and Human Rights First. In addition, four organizations-Pangea Legal Services, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc., Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. (CLINIC), and Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition – filed a complaint in the Northern District of California challenging this sweeping new rule.  They are represented by the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program, and Sidley Austin LLP. 

In addition, DOJ finalized their harmful rule on administrative closure as well as the EOIR fee rule. ASISTA remains deeply opposed to these rules and will keep you informed of advocacy efforts as they develop. Read more here. 

From all of us at ASISTA to all of you, we wish you a happy and healthy start to 2021, and look forward to continuing our work together in the new year!

www.asistahelp.org
Our mailing address is:
PO Box 12, Suffield, CT, 06078

Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

ASISTA Practice Alert: USCIS Extreme Vetting Policies and Their Implication for Immigrant Survivors (Dec. 12, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • December 12, 2025
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.

ASISTA Practice Alert: Impact of HR-1 on Trafficking Survivors (Oct. 1, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • December 12, 2025
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed HR-1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which significantly impacts immigrant survivors of human trafficking. The law imposes new filing fees for immigration benefits, motions, and appeals before USCIS and EOIR, establishes additional financial penalties for certain immigration violations, and eliminates eligibility for a range of federal public benefits for many immigrants who were previously considered “qualified,” including trafficking survivors. This Practice Alert reviews these fee and penalty changes, explains the new restrictions on public benefits, and outlines the impact on trafficking survivors seeking T visas and other forms of humanitarian relief, offering guidance for practitioners on how to mitigate the law’s potential harms.

Amicus Briefs on Birthright Citizenship Executive Order (Spring 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • June 11, 2025
In May and June 2025, ASISTA joined partners at Boston College School of Law, Harbor COV, and Tahirih to submit an amicus briefs to the First and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals in cases challenging the executive order on birthright citizenship. ASISTA and partners highlighted the importance of maintaining a preliminary injunction against implementing the order. If the order were implemented, many immigrant mothers of U.S.-born children would only be able to prove their child’s citizenship by submitting documentation about the child’s father’s immigration status. For survivors of intimate partner violence, just knowing the need for this documentation could make it difficult or impossible to leave the abusive relationship. For survivors of sexual assault or trafficking, contacting the perpetrator for the paperwork could put them and their families in immediate physical danger. Using real-life examples, the brief illustrates the stakes if immigrant parents were forced to choose between maintaining their safety and establishing their children’s rights. It urges the court not let this become reality. Read the First Circuit Brief, Doe v. Trump , here ; read the Fourth Circuit Brief, Casa, Inc., et al. v. Trump , here .

Alien Enemies Act Alert (May 29, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • May 30, 2025
On March 14, 2025, President Trump attempted to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify carrying out deportations without the due process of immigration proceedings. Since then, multiple federal courts have ruled the invocation was unlawful, but the government continues to fight for its usage, including before the U.S. Supreme Court. On May 16, 2025, the Supreme Court maintained a temporary prohibition on the deportations planned in Texas and sent the issue back to the lower courts. ASISTA celebrates the positive rulings but notes with condemnation that the push against them is ongoing. Check ASISTA’s alert: The Fight to Protect Survivors from the Alien Enemies Act Continue.

ASISTA Practice Alert: USCIS Wet Ink Signature RFEs & NOIDs (April 24, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • April 28, 2025
Practitioners have reported receiving RFEs and NOIDs in cases submitted with electronically reproduced signatures for original, wet ink signatures where USCIS has requested the original, wet ink signatures. This Practice Alert describes what USCIS’ current signature policy is and what options practitioners have in these cases.