Impact of Latest Executive Order on Survivor-based Forms of Immigration Benefits

By Admin

|

April 23, 2020

by: Cecelia Friedman Levin, ASISTA Policy Director with Grace Huang, Policy Director, Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-based Violence

Yesterday, President Trump signed an executive order temporarily halting entry of certain individuals seeking to enter the U.S. on immigrant visas (as permanent residents) for 60 days. The order will be effective as of 11:59 pm ET on April 23, 2020.

The order covers ONLY those who are:

  • outside the United States;
  • do not have an immigrant visa that is valid as of 11:59 pm ET on April 23, 2020 and
  • do not have an official travel document other than a visa (such as a transportation letter, an appropriate boarding foil, or an advance parole document) that is valid as of 11:59 pm ET on April 23, 2020 or issued on any date thereafter that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission.

The order lists the following categories as exemptions:

  • Legal Permanent Residents;
  • Spouses and minor children of U.S. citizens (those under 21), including prospective adoptees;
  • Members of the U.S. military and their spouses and children;
  • Medical health professionals seeking to assist with COVID-19 response or 

  • those coming to perform “work essential to combatting, recovering from or otherwise alleviating the effects of COVID-19 and their immediate relatives (spouses, unmarried children under 21). This designation will be determined by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of State (DOS).

  • Employment Based immigrant investors
  • Afghani or Iraqi interpreters or others who have worked for US government
  • Others designated by State Dept, DHS whose entry is in the national interest or whose entry would further important law enforcement objectives in the United States.

Who is impacted?

The executive order would cover the following categories of individuals seeking to enter the United States on an immigrant visa

  • parents and adult children (over 21) of U.S. Citizens, 
  • spouses and children of green card holders;
  • diversity visa applicants
  • Most immigrant visas based on employment

These categories of individuals would not be able to obtain visas to enter for at least the 60 day period of the order. Even those family members who have a valid visa but do not also have a valid travel document would not be able to enter the United States unless they fall under one of the noted exceptions. The Migration Policy Institute estimates this order would block about 26,000 green cards a month or 52,000 over the 60 days of the proclamation. The impact of the executive order would be increasingly more significant if the Administration were to extend it beyond this initial 60 day period, and could impact over 350,000 green card cases per year.

With regard to survivor-based relief under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) or the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), the following could be directly impacted by the order if they are abroad and seeking to enter the U.S under the following categories:

  • An approved I-929 Petition for Qualifying Family Member for U-1 Nonimmigrant
  • An approved VAWA self-petition based on abuse by a LPR spouse or parent
  • An approved VAWA self-petition based on being an abused parent of an abusive U.S. Citizen son or daughter. 

Who is not impacted by this order?

USCIS will continue to accept and process applications and petitions, and the executive order does not change that. Keep in mind that USCIS has temporarily suspended in-person services through at least May 3, 2020, including in-person interviews and biometrics processing, though the agency will provide emergency services for limited in-person situations. The executive order does not impact survivors who are applying for immigration benefits like VAWA self-petitions or for a U or T visa or other forms of adjustment of status that are currently inside the United States.

The executive order does not completely stop all immigration into the United States; it does not apply to those individuals who are abroad seeking to enter on nonimmigrant visas, this includes U and T visas, which are a nonimmigrant classification status. However, the executive order does contain instructions to DHS and the Department of Labor (DOL) to consult with DOS within the next 30 days to “review nonimmigrant programs” and make recommendations regarding how to “stimulate the United States economy and ensure the prioritization, hiring, and employment of United States workers.” So, it is likely that other forms of nonimmigrant status may come under additional review at a later date.

The U.S. Department of State has already suspended routine visa services worldwide and consulates are subject to local government restrictions. During the COVID-19 crisis, consulates are providing emergency and “mission critical” services, including for medical professionals, and H-2 visa holders. Thus under the current policy, It is unlikely that the consulates would be processing immigrant visas based on VAWA relief during the COVID-19 crisis unless it is emergency processing.

Bottom line: 

As advocates, it is important to be messengers to survivors we serve to let them know that it is unlikely this executive order would impact the processing of applications like VAWA self-petitions, U and T visas if they are applying from here in the United States.

Please do reach out to ASISTA if you have any questions about this executive order and its impact on the survivors you serve. For technical assistance questions, please click here or contact questions@asisthelp.org

Additional resources:

Recent Posts

ASISTA Practice Alert: USCIS Extreme Vetting Policies and Their Implication for Immigrant Survivors (Dec. 12, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • December 12, 2025
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.

ASISTA Practice Alert: Impact of HR-1 on Trafficking Survivors (Oct. 1, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • December 12, 2025
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed HR-1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which significantly impacts immigrant survivors of human trafficking. The law imposes new filing fees for immigration benefits, motions, and appeals before USCIS and EOIR, establishes additional financial penalties for certain immigration violations, and eliminates eligibility for a range of federal public benefits for many immigrants who were previously considered “qualified,” including trafficking survivors. This Practice Alert reviews these fee and penalty changes, explains the new restrictions on public benefits, and outlines the impact on trafficking survivors seeking T visas and other forms of humanitarian relief, offering guidance for practitioners on how to mitigate the law’s potential harms.

Amicus Briefs on Birthright Citizenship Executive Order (Spring 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • June 11, 2025
In May and June 2025, ASISTA joined partners at Boston College School of Law, Harbor COV, and Tahirih to submit an amicus briefs to the First and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals in cases challenging the executive order on birthright citizenship. ASISTA and partners highlighted the importance of maintaining a preliminary injunction against implementing the order. If the order were implemented, many immigrant mothers of U.S.-born children would only be able to prove their child’s citizenship by submitting documentation about the child’s father’s immigration status. For survivors of intimate partner violence, just knowing the need for this documentation could make it difficult or impossible to leave the abusive relationship. For survivors of sexual assault or trafficking, contacting the perpetrator for the paperwork could put them and their families in immediate physical danger. Using real-life examples, the brief illustrates the stakes if immigrant parents were forced to choose between maintaining their safety and establishing their children’s rights. It urges the court not let this become reality. Read the First Circuit Brief, Doe v. Trump , here ; read the Fourth Circuit Brief, Casa, Inc., et al. v. Trump , here .

Alien Enemies Act Alert (May 29, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • May 30, 2025
On March 14, 2025, President Trump attempted to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify carrying out deportations without the due process of immigration proceedings. Since then, multiple federal courts have ruled the invocation was unlawful, but the government continues to fight for its usage, including before the U.S. Supreme Court. On May 16, 2025, the Supreme Court maintained a temporary prohibition on the deportations planned in Texas and sent the issue back to the lower courts. ASISTA celebrates the positive rulings but notes with condemnation that the push against them is ongoing. Check ASISTA’s alert: The Fight to Protect Survivors from the Alien Enemies Act Continue.

ASISTA Practice Alert: USCIS Wet Ink Signature RFEs & NOIDs (April 24, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • April 28, 2025
Practitioners have reported receiving RFEs and NOIDs in cases submitted with electronically reproduced signatures for original, wet ink signatures where USCIS has requested the original, wet ink signatures. This Practice Alert describes what USCIS’ current signature policy is and what options practitioners have in these cases.