Important Policy & Practice Updates

By Admin

|

January 16, 2021

There have been many policy and practice updates over the last few weeks. We’ve compiled a short list of a few important updates to help you keep track.

1. Upcoming Closures

  • USCIS temporarily suspends in-person services. USCIS announced Friday afternoon that it will temporarily suspend in-person services next Tuesday and Wednesday. USCIS issued the following notice:
  • “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services today announced it will temporarily suspend in-person services at all field offices, asylum offices and application support centers on Jan. 19 and 20 to ensure the safety of our employees and individuals with appointments. USCIS will reschedule individuals who had appointments on Jan. 19 and 20 and send them notices with their new appointment dates. The USCIS website and USCIS Contact Center will remain available for information, case status updates, and other online tools and resources.”
  • EOIR closures: On Friday, January 15th, EOIR announced it will close immigration courts on Tuesday and Wednesday January 19 and 20 in certain cities where planned protests have been announced. The announcement was posted on Twitter, and states “Due to planned protests, the Arlington, Atlanta – Ted Turner Drive, Boston, Denver, Hartford, Phoenix, and Sacramento immigration courts will be closed Jan. 19 and Jan. 20. The Salt Lake City Immigration Court will be closed Jan. 20. Please monitor EOIR’s website for information about the agency’s operations nationwide.

2. USCIS Fee Rule Enjoined: On December 28, 2020, the government filed an unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of its appeal in ILRC v. Wolf. This means that the increased fees and changes to fee waiver policies and procedures under the August 2020 rule will not be implemented by USCIS at this time. In addition, changes to the I-912 form initially proposed in September 2018 continue to be enjoined pursuant to cases City of Seattle v. DHS. Thus, USCIS will continue to accept current editions and fees, and adjudicate fee waivers according to guidance found in the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) Chapters 10.9 and 10.10. (i.e. USCIS will accept fee waivers based on the three stated grounds of means-tested benefit, income at or below 150% FPG, and economic hardship.) 

3. Asylum Updates

  • Harmful Asylum Rule Blocked: On January 8, 2021, The U..S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction blocking a sweeping Trump administration rule that would gut protections for people fleeing persecution and torture. The case, Pangea Legal Services II v. Barr, was filed by organizational plaintiffs Pangea Legal Services, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc., Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. (CLINIC), and Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition following the rule’s publication in December. The groups are represented by the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program, and Sidley Austin LLP. For more information, see CGRS’ bilingual statement here.
  • Matter of A-B- On Thursday, January 14, 2021, Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen issued a new ruling in Matter of A-B-, the asylum case that has been pivotal for survivors of domestic violence, gang violence and other abuses since its initial certification in 2018. Read more about this from our partners at the Center for Gender and Refugees Studies.

4. Receipt Notice Delays at USCIS Lockbox Facilities. In a notice to stakeholders late Friday January 8, 2021, USCIS acknowledged Receipt Notice delays and issues at all USCIS lockbox facilities (Chicago, IL, Phoenix, AZ and Lewisville, TX), “Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other factors, USCIS is experiencing delays in issuing receipt notices for some applications and petitions filed at a USCIS lockbox facility. The information below explains the current state of our lockbox operations and the issues affecting receipt notices.”  USCIS recommends filing online where possible, creating a USCIS online account, and submitting Form G-1145 E-Notification of Application/Petition Acceptance. Because of these delays and the potential for receipt notice irregularities, we remind ASISTA members of these filing tips:

  • Submit all filings to USCIS using a trackable delivery method.
  • Track and maintain evidence of delivery confirmation for each case filing. 
  • Check the filing date (and priority date, if applicable) on each I-797 receipt notice immediately upon receipt for any potential discrepancies.
  • For additional case practice tips, visit ASISTA’s Practice Advisory page. As always, if you have case-specific questions, please submit your technical assistance request through our members-only portal. 

5. Is approval of TPS status an admission? The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether approval of TPS status is an “admission” for purposes of adjustment of status under INA §245. In the underlying decision, the 3rd Circuit found that TPS is not an admission, siding with the 5th circuit and breaking from the 6th and 9th circuits which found that approval of TPS is an admission.

6. Automatic Extension of LPR cards: USCIS has recently changed procedures to automatically extend LPR cards – LPR cards will now be extended automatically for 12 months when an I-90 is filed. The extension will be noted on the I-797 receipt notices. This change came about as part of Ruiz v. DHS (CD Calif), a pending class action regarding the unavailability of I-551 stamps. The I-797 notices will be similar to those issued to extend conditional permanent resident status upon filing of form I-751. Huge thanks to ASISTA members representing the plaintiffs: Javier Maldonado, Stacy Tolchin, Megan Brewer, and Sabrina Damast!

7. EOIR Guidance on Continuances: EOIR issued new policy guidance on Continuances on January 7, 2021. This guidance contains a “non-exhaustive list of relevant legal and policy principles as an aid to adjudicators considering common types of continuance requests.” This guidance “encourages” adjudicators to consider EOIR’s new proposed rule on continuances for “helpful information” even though the proposed rule has not been finalized. ASISTA strongly opposes this new proposed rule (see our comment here) and are deeply concerned about this language in the guidance. 

For any questions about these announcements, please contact us at questions@asistahelp.org.

Recent Posts

ASISTA Practice Pointer: Hot Tips for Contacting USCIS About Pending Survivor-Based Cases (Updated March 24, 2026)

By Maria Lazzarino • April 28, 2026
This Practice Pointer synthesizes current recommendations for using USCIS customer service options for survivor-based relief applications. It also discusses how to supplement pending survivor-based petitions via mail, with the hotlines as a backup paper trail. As noted throughout, the information is accurate up to the publication date, but should always be cross-checked with information on USCIS’s website and Policy Manual for the most up-to-date government provisos. This project was supported by Grant No. 15JOVW-23-GK-05161-MUMU awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication/program/exhibition are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women.

ASISTA POLICY ALERT: Policy Manual Updates to 8 USC § 1367 Confidentiality Protections (Feb. 3, 2026)

By Maria Lazzarino • April 28, 2026
On December 22, 2025, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) released an update to its Policy Manual relating to confidentiality protections located at 8 USC § 1367 (“1367 protections”). This Policy Alert will review the changes introduced by the policy update and provide initial guidance to practitioners filing cases affected by them. ASISTA will provide further guidance through training and written resources as warranted, and members are encouraged to request technical assistance for any individual case questions.

Hotline Contact for U Receipt Notices Starting with IOE (April 2026)

By Maria Lazzarino • April 24, 2026
ASISTA is aware that the USCIS “Contact Us” page does not include information about which hotline address should be contacted for U cases with receipt numbers that start with IOE. After reaching out to USCIS, until the Contact Us page is updated to reflect their “final determination,” practitioners inquiring about U cases with receipt numbers starting with IOE should reach out to the VSC 918/914 hotline. See this Practice Alert for more information.

ASISTA Practice Alert: USCIS Extreme Vetting Policies and Their Implication for Immigrant Survivors (Dec. 12, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • December 12, 2025
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.

ASISTA Practice Alert: Impact of HR-1 on Trafficking Survivors (Oct. 1, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • December 12, 2025
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed HR-1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which significantly impacts immigrant survivors of human trafficking. The law imposes new filing fees for immigration benefits, motions, and appeals before USCIS and EOIR, establishes additional financial penalties for certain immigration violations, and eliminates eligibility for a range of federal public benefits for many immigrants who were previously considered “qualified,” including trafficking survivors. This Practice Alert reviews these fee and penalty changes, explains the new restrictions on public benefits, and outlines the impact on trafficking survivors seeking T visas and other forms of humanitarian relief, offering guidance for practitioners on how to mitigate the law’s potential harms.