LGBTQ+ Immigrant Survivors at Greater Risk

By Ahlam Moussa

|

June 28, 2024

LGBTQ+ Immigrant Survivors at Greater Risk

At ASISTA, we see all too often how LGBTQ+ immigrant survivors of violence are subject to increased vulnerability on the path to safety and justice in the US. Homophobia and transphobia, whether “casual” or institutionalized, result in additional barriers to services, decreased access to justice, and a greater risk of experiencing violence for already-traumatized immigrant survivors. Now, a powerful new report just released by Immigration Equality, the National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC), and Human Rights First (HRF) details grossly unjust conditions with CBP and ICE detention for LGBTQ and HIV-positive people. According to the report, "No Human Being Should Be Held Here”: The Mistreatment of LGBTQ and HIV-Positive People in Federal Immigration Jails", these conditions routinely include high rates of physical and sexual violence, improper and prolonged solitary confinement, and inadequate medical care.” For survivors of gender-based violence (GBV), experiencing detention and otherwise navigating the US’s byzantine immigration system while also enduring heightened risks of discrimination, abuse, and neglect based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity only further compound existing trauma.

As June draws to a close and many corporations prepare to shelve their rainbow flags and themed merchandise until next year’s Pride celebration, we urge our community to honor Pride’s multiple meanings. The celebration that Pride represents–of strength, resistance, resilience, and the hard-fought gains toward a more just world for people of all genders and sexual orientations–is undeniably valuable. But headlines from around the country and around the world regularly remind us that these battles are far from over–and that Pride also represents an urgent, unrelenting call for safety and justice for LGBTQ+ people. As hateful rhetoric and attacks against immigrants and LGBTQ+ individuals continue to mount, we thank you for joining us in the ongoing fight for dignity, rights, and liberty for LGBTQ+ immigrant survivors of violence.

Recent Posts

ASISTA Practice Alert: USCIS Extreme Vetting Policies and Their Implication for Immigrant Survivors (Dec. 12, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • December 12, 2025
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.

ASISTA Practice Alert: Impact of HR-1 on Trafficking Survivors (Oct. 1, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • December 12, 2025
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed HR-1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which significantly impacts immigrant survivors of human trafficking. The law imposes new filing fees for immigration benefits, motions, and appeals before USCIS and EOIR, establishes additional financial penalties for certain immigration violations, and eliminates eligibility for a range of federal public benefits for many immigrants who were previously considered “qualified,” including trafficking survivors. This Practice Alert reviews these fee and penalty changes, explains the new restrictions on public benefits, and outlines the impact on trafficking survivors seeking T visas and other forms of humanitarian relief, offering guidance for practitioners on how to mitigate the law’s potential harms.

Amicus Briefs on Birthright Citizenship Executive Order (Spring 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • June 11, 2025
In May and June 2025, ASISTA joined partners at Boston College School of Law, Harbor COV, and Tahirih to submit an amicus briefs to the First and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals in cases challenging the executive order on birthright citizenship. ASISTA and partners highlighted the importance of maintaining a preliminary injunction against implementing the order. If the order were implemented, many immigrant mothers of U.S.-born children would only be able to prove their child’s citizenship by submitting documentation about the child’s father’s immigration status. For survivors of intimate partner violence, just knowing the need for this documentation could make it difficult or impossible to leave the abusive relationship. For survivors of sexual assault or trafficking, contacting the perpetrator for the paperwork could put them and their families in immediate physical danger. Using real-life examples, the brief illustrates the stakes if immigrant parents were forced to choose between maintaining their safety and establishing their children’s rights. It urges the court not let this become reality. Read the First Circuit Brief, Doe v. Trump , here ; read the Fourth Circuit Brief, Casa, Inc., et al. v. Trump , here .

Alien Enemies Act Alert (May 29, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • May 30, 2025
On March 14, 2025, President Trump attempted to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify carrying out deportations without the due process of immigration proceedings. Since then, multiple federal courts have ruled the invocation was unlawful, but the government continues to fight for its usage, including before the U.S. Supreme Court. On May 16, 2025, the Supreme Court maintained a temporary prohibition on the deportations planned in Texas and sent the issue back to the lower courts. ASISTA celebrates the positive rulings but notes with condemnation that the push against them is ongoing. Check ASISTA’s alert: The Fight to Protect Survivors from the Alien Enemies Act Continue.

ASISTA Practice Alert: USCIS Wet Ink Signature RFEs & NOIDs (April 24, 2025)

By Maria Lazzarino • April 28, 2025
Practitioners have reported receiving RFEs and NOIDs in cases submitted with electronically reproduced signatures for original, wet ink signatures where USCIS has requested the original, wet ink signatures. This Practice Alert describes what USCIS’ current signature policy is and what options practitioners have in these cases.