Press Release: ASISTA Urges Senators to Reject Border Deal that Exposes Immigrant Survivors to Further Trauma, Hardship, and Violence (February 6, 2024)

By Ahlam Moussa

|

February 6, 2024

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 6, 2024

Contact: Cristina Velez, cristina@asistahelp.org

ASISTA Urges Senators to Reject Border Deal that Exposes Immigrant Survivors to Further Trauma, Hardship, and Violence

After months of opaque negotiations, a small group of senators released a bill on Sunday, February 4, 2024 that would eviscerate access to asylum, create a dangerous new statutory authority to expel asylum-seekers from the United States, expand detention, and limit review of decisions. The bill includes some positive changes, such as protections for Afghan arrivals and increased funding for representation and resettlement.  If passed, however, this legislation would condemn immigrant survivors fleeing gender-based violence to further harm, trauma, and potentially death. ASISTA urges the Senate and White House to immediately reverse course and reject this harmful bill.

ASISTA is deeply concerned by several of the bill’s provisions that would curtail the rights of immigrant survivors seeking asylum. First, the bill’s new fast-track asylum process, which contemplates an asylum decision within 90 days of arrival in the United States, sets immigrant survivors up to fail. No asylum seeker should be rushed through the dizzyingly complex U.S. asylum system, particularly as it is widely known that trauma impairs the ability of survivors to tell a linear story under the immense pressure of a formal proceeding. Immigrant survivors need support to heal and to find safe shelter, food, clothing, and medical treatment for themselves and their children. They need access to trauma-informed and language-accessible mental health professionals and legal representatives. Although the bill includes increased funding for representation of unaccompanied minors and persons deemed not competent, the vast majority of immigrant survivors would be left out in the cold.  

We also strongly oppose the bill’s expansion of detention and surveillance of asylum seekers. Both of these provisions would expose immigrant survivors to additional harms and inhibit their ability to access confidential, community-based services. Such intrusive monitoring is stigmatizing, and would be highly re-traumatizing to immigrant survivors who have had their movements tracked by abusers, or who have suffered surveillance by the government in their country of origin because of their religion, political views, or LGBTQ+ identity. Moreover, under this bill, immigrant survivors facing life-or-death situations would have fewer appellate protections than plaintiffs in small claims court. This is also unacceptable. The bill provides virtually no time to file appeals. Even for those few who could file timely appeals, in all but the most extraordinary cases, the only review available is by an appellate panel of three more asylum officers. ASISTA opposes the virtually unchecked discretionary authority and evisceration of judicial review contemplated by this bill.  

Kirsten Rambo, Executive Director of ASISTA, states,

“ASISTA stands with immigrant survivors of gender-based violence by opposing this legislation. The restrictions on asylum contained in this bill leave immigrant survivors more vulnerable to violence, and separated from the trauma-informed, community-based supports and representation that are crucial to healing and the ability to present claims for much-needed relief. Despite some of the positive aspects of the bill, we oppose any deal that leaves immigrant survivors suffering, isolated, and at greater risk of further harm.” 

ASISTA urges its members, partners, and everyone who cares about survivors to join us and countless other immigrant rights organizations in moving swiftly to oppose this bill. 

 ###

Established in 2008, ASISTA is a national leader in the movement for safety and justice for immigrant survivors of gender-based violence. ASISTA’s founders helped write the immigration provisions of the federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act (TVPA), affording legal status to hundreds of thousands of survivors and their children since 1994. With over 2,500 members nationwide, ASISTA’s work is focused on 1) providing expert case consultation, training, and resources to attorneys and advocates navigating the complex immigration system on behalf of survivors of gender-based violence, including intervening in specific cases as needed; 2) pushing for federal, state and local policies that ensure safety and justice for immigrant survivors; and 3) coordinating lawsuits to prevent the government from unfairly deporting survivors of violence. To learn more about ASISTA’s work, click here. Follow us on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and LinkedIn.

Recent Posts

By Maria Lazzarino December 12, 2025
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges.
By Maria Lazzarino December 12, 2025
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed HR-1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which significantly impacts immigrant survivors of human trafficking. The law imposes new filing fees for immigration benefits, motions, and appeals before USCIS and EOIR, establishes additional financial penalties for certain immigration violations, and eliminates eligibility for a range of federal public benefits for many immigrants who were previously considered “qualified,” including trafficking survivors. This Practice Alert reviews these fee and penalty changes, explains the new restrictions on public benefits, and outlines the impact on trafficking survivors seeking T visas and other forms of humanitarian relief, offering guidance for practitioners on how to mitigate the law’s potential harms.
By Maria Lazzarino June 11, 2025
In May and June 2025, ASISTA joined partners at Boston College School of Law, Harbor COV, and Tahirih to submit an amicus briefs to the First and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals in cases challenging the executive order on birthright citizenship. ASISTA and partners highlighted the importance of maintaining a preliminary injunction against implementing the order. If the order were implemented, many immigrant mothers of U.S.-born children would only be able to prove their child’s citizenship by submitting documentation about the child’s father’s immigration status. For survivors of intimate partner violence, just knowing the need for this documentation could make it difficult or impossible to leave the abusive relationship. For survivors of sexual assault or trafficking, contacting the perpetrator for the paperwork could put them and their families in immediate physical danger. Using real-life examples, the brief illustrates the stakes if immigrant parents were forced to choose between maintaining their safety and establishing their children’s rights. It urges the court not let this become reality. Read the First Circuit Brief, Doe v. Trump , here ; read the Fourth Circuit Brief, Casa, Inc., et al. v. Trump , here .
By Maria Lazzarino May 30, 2025
On March 14, 2025, President Trump attempted to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify carrying out deportations without the due process of immigration proceedings. Since then, multiple federal courts have ruled the invocation was unlawful, but the government continues to fight for its usage, including before the U.S. Supreme Court. On May 16, 2025, the Supreme Court maintained a temporary prohibition on the deportations planned in Texas and sent the issue back to the lower courts. ASISTA celebrates the positive rulings but notes with condemnation that the push against them is ongoing. Check ASISTA’s alert: The Fight to Protect Survivors from the Alien Enemies Act Continue.
By Maria Lazzarino April 28, 2025
Practitioners have reported receiving RFEs and NOIDs in cases submitted with electronically reproduced signatures for original, wet ink signatures where USCIS has requested the original, wet ink signatures. This Practice Alert describes what USCIS’ current signature policy is and what options practitioners have in these cases.